Working on IE II lab 1

Posted by Peter Kurdziel on November 2, 2008

I drew out my topology map with the routing protocols and my layer 2 map. I also wrote out my task tracker.

Loops = 2 but they are contained in a single routing protocol so I do not need to worry about them.

Spotting the issues:

Right off the bat I know there will be some sort of OSPF network type issue between R3-5 and a split an EIGRP split horizon issue on R2.

I started with Cat and moved on to FR. Then I skipped to RIP since it has the least amount of work to do. Then I moved on to EIGRP also since it does not have a lot of tasks.

I had company so I had to waste 6 hrs of my rack time.

I ran into a weird issue with EIGRP and got stuck.

I am getting a K-value mismatch & retry limit exceeded messages
25 messages

Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:10 PM

To: ccielab@groupstudy.com

Switch:

05:04:04: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 100: Neighbor 183.1.105.5 (FastEthernet0/18) is up: new adjacency
–More–
05:05:23: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 100: Neighbor 183.1.105.5 (FastEthernet0/18) is down: K-value mismatch
–More–
05:05:26: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 100: Neighbor 183.1.105.5 (FastEthernet0/18) is up: new adjacency

router eigrp 100
network 183.1.105.10 0.0.0.0
network 183.1.107.10 0.0.0.0
no auto-summary
eigrp router-id 150.1.10.10

interface FastEthernet0/18
no switchport
ip address 183.1.105.10 255.255.255.0

Routing Protocol is “eigrp 100″
Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Default networks flagged in outgoing updates
Default networks accepted from incoming updates
EIGRP metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0
EIGRP maximum hopcount 100
EIGRP maximum metric variance 1
Redistributing: eigrp 100
EIGRP NSF-aware route hold timer is 240s
Automatic network summarization is not in effect
Maximum path: 4
Routing for Networks:
183.1.105.10/32
183.1.107.10/32
Routing Information Sources:
Gateway Distance Last Update
183.1.107.7 90 00:07:43
Distance: internal 90 external 170

router:
*Nov 2 13:55:54.926: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 100: Neighbor 183.1.105.10 (FastEthernet0/0) is down: retry limit exceeded
RSRack1R5(config-router)#
*Nov 2 13:55:57.322: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 100: Neighbor 183.1.105.10 (FastEthernet0/0) is up: new adjacency
RSRack1R5(config-router)#
*Nov 2 13:57:16.834: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 100: Neighbor 183.1.105.10 (FastEthernet0/0) is down: retry limit exceeded
RSRack1R5(config-router)#
*Nov 2 13:57:20.290: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 100: Neighbor 183.1.105.10 (FastEthernet0/0) is up: new adjacency

router eigrp 100
network 183.1.105.5 0.0.0.0
no auto-summary
eigrp router-id 150.1.5.5

interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 183.1.105.5 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto

Routing Protocol is “eigrp 100″
Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Default networks flagged in outgoing updates
Default networks accepted from incoming updates
EIGRP metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0
EIGRP maximum hopcount 100
EIGRP maximum metric variance 1
Redistributing: eigrp 100
EIGRP NSF-aware route hold timer is 240s
Automatic network summarization is not in effect
Maximum path: 4
Routing for Networks:
183.1.105.5/32
Routing Information Sources:
Gateway Distance Last Update
183.1.105.10 90 00:09:49
Distance: internal 90 external 170

Jason Madsen <madsen.jason@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:21 PM

To: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

strange…you don’t have a BW or timer mismatch do you? your K values used seems to be the default on both ends at least. i don’t think MTU has to match for EIGRP like it does with OSPF or i’d consider it as well.

Jason

[Quoted text hidden]

[Quoted text hidden]

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:24 PM

To: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com

Make sure that the interfaces are in the correct VLANs, do not put all interfaces of all routers in the same VLAN. If you are doing it in Frame-relay, you should ensure that there are no other frame mapping that ones desired.

[Quoted text hidden]

[Quoted text hidden]

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

–
Narbik Kocharians
CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
www.MicronicsTraining
www.Net-Workbooks.com
Sr. Technical Instructor

Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 3:02 PM

To: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com

Piotr,

Check that the MTUs match on both devices. I notice one is a switch. Though the specs do not require equal MTU (like OSPF does) Cisco routers have been known to drop EIGRP packets over MTU mismatch issues.
The K-value mismatch error can be caused when the near side router does not support the “goodbye” message, added around 12.2(3), but the far side does.

HTH,

Bob Sinclair CCIE 10427 CCSI 30427
www.netmasterclass.net

Piotr wrote:

[Quoted text hidden]

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:16 PM

To: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>

Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com

The interfaces appear to be in the correct vlans as per the solution.

[Quoted text hidden]

Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:16 PM

To: ccielab@groupstudy.com

I am working on IE II lab 1 task 3.6. I started with the cat then frame, rip and I am on eigrp (switch to router). I’ll do eigrp router to router next then move on to OSPF.

[Quoted text hidden]

Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:22 PM

To: Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>

Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com

On the routers I left the MTU at default,m 1500. On the switches (3550/3560) I set the system MTU to 1500 (system MTU 1500 or system MTU routing 1500. Where allowed on the interface I set ip mtu 1500).

Debugs don’t show me anything. I was looking to shut the messages off with a command similar to ip ospf mtu-ignore but I don’t see one under the interface.

I can try and set the metric for all devices in the AS and see what happens.

[Quoted text hidden]

Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:35 PM

To: Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>

Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com

Nov 2 18:34:24.797: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on FastEthernet0/0
*Nov 2 18:34:24.797:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0
RSRack1R5#
*Nov 2 18:34:28.593: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/0 nbr 183.1.105.10, retry 16, RTO 5000
*Nov 2 18:34:28.593:   AS 100, Flags 0×1, Seq 435/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/2
*Nov 2 18:34:29.557: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on FastEthernet0/0
*Nov 2 18:34:29.557:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0
RSRack1R5#
*Nov 2 18:34:33.593: EIGRP: Retransmission retry limit exceeded
*Nov 2 18:34:33.593: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on FastEthernet0/0
*Nov 2 18:34:33.593:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0
*Nov 2 18:34:33.597: EIGRP: Holdtime expired
*Nov 2 18:34:33.597: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 100: Neighbor 183.1.105.10 (FastEthernet0/0) is down: retry limit exceeded
RSRack1R5#
*Nov 2 18:34:33.597: Going down: Peer 183.1.105.10 total=0 stub 0 template=0, iidb-stub=0 iid-all=0
*Nov 2 18:34:33.597: EIGRP: FastEthernet0/0 multicast flow blocking cleared
*Nov 2 18:34:33.597: EIGRP: Neighbor 183.1.105.10 went down on FastEthernet0/0
RSRack1R5#
*Nov 2 18:34:38.069: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on FastEthernet0/0
*Nov 2 18:34:38.069:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0
RSRack1R5#
*Nov 2 18:34:42.633: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on FastEthernet0/0
*Nov 2 18:34:42.633:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0
RSRack1R5#
*Nov 2 18:34:47.289: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on FastEthernet0/0
*Nov 2 18:34:47.289:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0
RSRack1R5#
*Nov 2 18:34:51.765: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on FastEthernet0/0
*Nov 2 18:34:51.765:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0
RSRack1R5#
*Nov 2 18:34:56.377: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on FastEthernet0/0
*Nov 2 18:34:56.377:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0
RSRack1R5#ping
*Nov 2 18:35:01.265: EIGRP: Sending HELLO on FastEthernet0/0
*Nov 2 18:35:01.265:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0
RSRack1R5#ping 183.1.105.10

04:03:06: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:06:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
04:03:07: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:07:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
04:03:07:        K-value mismatch
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:07: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 100: Neighbor 183.1.105.5 (FastEthernet0/18) is down: K-value mismatch
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:10: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:10:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0
04:03:10: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 100: Neighbor 183.1.105.5 (FastEthernet0/18) is up: new adjacency
04:03:10: EIGRP: Enqueueing UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5 iidbQ un/rely 0/1 peerQ un/rely 0/0 serno 1-6
04:03:10: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:10:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 sernRSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:10: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:10:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
04:03:10: EIGRP: Received Sequence TLV from 183.1.105.5
04:03:10:        183.1.105.10
04:03:10:        clearing CR-mode
04:03:10: EIGRP: Received CR sequence TLV from 183.1.105.5, sequence 436
04:03:10: EIGRP: Received UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:10:   AS 100, Flags 0xA, Seq 436/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1, n
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#ot in CR-mode, packet discarded
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:12: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 1, RTO 3000
04:03:12:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:15: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:15:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
04:03:15: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 2, RTO 4500
04:03:15:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:19: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:19:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
04:03:19: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 3, RTO 5000
04:03:19:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:24: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:24:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
04:03:24: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 4, RTO 5000
04:03:24:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:28: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:28:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:29: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 5, RTO 5000
04:03:29:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:33: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:33:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:34: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 6, RTO 5000
04:03:34:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:38: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:38:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:39: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 7, RTO 5000
04:03:39:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:42: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:42:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:44: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 8, RTO 5000
04:03:44:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:47: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:47:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:49: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 9, RTO 5000
04:03:49:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:52: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:52:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:54: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 10, RTO 5000
04:03:54:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:57: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:03:57:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:03:59: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 11, RTO 5000
04:03:59:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:04:01: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:04:01:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:04:04: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 12, RTO 5000
04:04:04:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:04:06: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:04:06:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:04:09: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 13, RTO 5000
04:04:09:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:04:11: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:04:11:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:04:14: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 14, RTO 5000
04:04:14:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:04:16: EIGRP: Received HELLO on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5
04:04:16:   AS 100, Flags 0×0, Seq 0/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:04:19: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 15, RTO 5000
04:04:19:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6
RSRack1SW4(config-router)#
04:04:24: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on FastEthernet0/18 nbr 183.1.105.5, retry 16, RTO 5000
04:04:24:   AS 100, Flags 0×9, Seq 180/0 idbQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 serno 1-6

From R5 I can not ping 183.1.105.10. From SW1 I can ping 183.1.105.10. R5 is connected to SW1.

[Quoted text hidden]

Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:43 PM

To: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Cc: Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>, ccielab@groupstudy.com

When does it happen? After you change a parameter? I think I have seen the issue that Bob talked about with the goodbye message causing a K-value mismatch….It looks like you are getting the K-value mismatch, then your adjacency is forming. This means your adjacency was brought down for some reason – maybe you configured a summary or secondary address…

Example: I had an initial config with a mistake (on purpose). One router on a LAN with /24 and the other with /20 mask. After I configured the /20 for a /24, EIGRP sent a goodbye and the other router complained about a K-value mismatch. The adjacency then came up fine.

I wonder if its a code issue…I am always running 12.4…

On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com> wrote:

[Quoted text hidden]

Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:44 PM

To: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Cc: Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>, ccielab@groupstudy.com

What is the mask of each interface?

[Quoted text hidden]

Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:45 PM

To: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Is the mask 255.255.255.248 on one end and something else on the other?

[Quoted text hidden]

Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:56 PM

To: Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>

Cc: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>, Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>, ccielab@groupstudy.com

Can you show us the configuration of the interfaces.

[Quoted text hidden]

Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:06 PM

To: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>

Cc: Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>, Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>, ccielab@groupstudy.com

RSRack1SW1(config-if)#do sho ip route 183.1.105.5
Routing entry for 183.1.105.0/24
Known via “eigrp 100″, distance 90, metric 30720, type internal
Redistributing via eigrp 100
Last update from 183.1.107.10 on FastEthernet0/14, 00:20:27 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 183.1.107.10, from 183.1.107.10, 00:20:27 ago, via FastEthernet0/14
Route metric is 30720, traffic share count is 1
Total delay is 200 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1

RSRack1SW1(config-if)#do sho ip route 183.1.105.10
Routing entry for 183.1.105.0/24
Known via “eigrp 100″, distance 90, metric 30720, type internal
Redistributing via eigrp 100
Last update from 183.1.107.10 on FastEthernet0/14, 00:20:31 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 183.1.107.10, from 183.1.107.10, 00:20:31 ago, via FastEthernet0/14
Route metric is 30720, traffic share count is 1
Total delay is 200 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1

[Quoted text hidden]

Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:09 PM

To: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>

Cc: Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>, Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>, ccielab@groupstudy.com

R5 F0/0 has a physical connection to sw f0/5

RSRack1R5(config-if)#do sri f0/0
Building configuration…

Current configuration : 95 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 183.1.105.5 255.255.255.0
duplex full
speed 100
end

RSRack1SW1(config)#do sri f0/5
Building configuration…

Current configuration : 109 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/5
switchport access vlan 105
switchport mode access
speed 100
duplex full
end

On the topology map R5 F0/0 connects to sw4 f0/18

SRack1SW4(config-router)# do sri f0/18
Building configuration…

Current configuration : 88 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet0/18
no switchport
ip address 183.1.105.10 255.255.255.0
end

[Quoted text hidden]

Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:14 PM

To: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>

Cc: Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>, Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>, ccielab@groupstudy.com

RSRack1SW1(config)#do sho int trunk

Port        Mode         Encapsulation Status        Native vlan
Fa0/13      on           802.1q         trunking      46
Fa0/15      on           802.1q         trunking      46
Fa0/21      on           802.1q         trunking      1

Port        Vlans allowed on trunk
Fa0/13      1-4094
Fa0/15      1-4094
Fa0/21      1-4094

Port        Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Fa0/13      1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
Fa0/15      1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
Fa0/21      1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107

Port        Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Fa0/13      1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
Fa0/15      1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
Fa0/21      1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
RSRack1SW1(config)#

RSRack1SW4(config-if)#do sho int trunk

Port        Mode         Encapsulation Status        Native vlan
Fa0/15      on           802.1q         trunking      1
Fa0/19      on           802.1q         trunking      46
Fa0/20      on           802.1q         trunking      46

Port        Vlans allowed on trunk
Fa0/15      1-4094
Fa0/19      1-4094
Fa0/20      1-4094

Port        Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Fa0/15      1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
Fa0/19      1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
Fa0/20      1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107

Port        Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Fa0/15      1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
Fa0/19      1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
Fa0/20      1,6,28,33,45-46,102,105,107
RSRack1SW4(config-if)#do sho cdp nei
Capability Codes: R – Router, T – Trans Bridge, B – Source Route Bridge
S – Switch, H – Host, I – IGMP, r – Repeater, P – Phone

Device ID            Local Intrfce         Holdtme   Capability    Platform   Port ID
RSRack1SW3          Fas 0/20              132            S I      WS-C3550-2Fas 0/20
RSRack1SW3          Fas 0/19              132            S I      WS-C3550-2Fas 0/19
RSRack1SW3          Fas 0/21              132            S I      WS-C3550-2Fas 0/21
RSRack1SW2          Fas 0/18              157           R S I     WS-C3560-2Fas 0/21
RSRack1SW1          Fas 0/15              158           R S I     WS-C3560-2Fas 0/21
RSRack1R4           Fas 0/4               165           R S I     2811      Fas 0/1
RSRack1R6           Fas 0/6               165           R S I     2811      Fas 0/1

RSRack1SW1(config)#do ping 183.1.105.10

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 183.1.105.10, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
RSRack1SW1(config)#do ping 183.1.105.5

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 183.1.105.5, timeout is 2 seconds:
…..
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)

[Quoted text hidden]

Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:20 PM

To: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Cc: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>, Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>, ccielab@groupstudy.com

Let’s focus on the basics.

You said “From R5 I can not ping 183.1.105.10.”

SW1 as far as I can tell is not routing between SW4 and R5 so we do not care about its routing table or whether it can ping any address. Sw4 and R5 should have a layer 2 path somewhere. What is that path?

Solve this issue first.

[Quoted text hidden]

Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:20 PM

To: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com

Piotr,

Try consistent speed and duplex. Either both sides negotiate or both sides locked down.

-Bob Sinclair

Piotr wrote:

!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 183.1.105.5 255.255.255.0
duplex full
speed 100
end

interface FastEthernet0/18
no switchport
ip address 183.1.105.10 255.255.255.0
end

Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM

To: Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>

Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com

I nailed it down. No luck.

[Quoted text hidden]

Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:33 PM

To: Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>

Cc: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>, Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>, ccielab@groupstudy.com

SW4 > R5 – layer 2 path
sw4 f0/15 > sw1 f0/21 > r5 f0/0

[Quoted text hidden]

amernas <taloust@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:40 PM

To: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>, Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>

Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com

Piotr,

You can try to hardcode the k vlaues on both neighober

- Hamid

[Quoted text hidden]

ZZ <zurabz@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:42 PM

To: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Cc: Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>, Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>, ccielab@groupstudy.com

Try to change IP mtu on SW4

[Quoted text hidden]

Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:45 PM

To: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Cc: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>, Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>, ccielab@groupstudy.com

Are you sure that SW4 f0/18 is connected to SW1 f0/15…?There seems to be another switch involved because SW1 is trunking on f0/15….show cdp neighbor, something funny’s going on

[Quoted text hidden]

Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:47 PM

To: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Cc: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>, Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>, ccielab@groupstudy.com

As a side note you should have verified that R5 and SW4 could ping each other before moving on to routing. I learn the hard way too

[Quoted text hidden]

Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:30 PM

To: Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>

Cc: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>, Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net>, ccielab@groupstudy.com

I removed routing and checked my trunks. Everything looks ok.

On sw1 f0/5 I added 183.1.105.55/24 and I could ping that from R5.

I ran out of rack time……

Thanks everyone.

[Quoted text hidden]

Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com>

Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:45 PM

To: Piotr <usaccie@gmail.com>

next time you run into issue, let us/me know. i am curious to know what issue was.

[Quoted text hidden]

Like this:

Be the first to like this post.

This entry was posted on November 2, 2008 at 20:49 and is filed under Routing & Switching Lab. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Pete's Packet

Limitless

Catagories

Global visitors

CCIE Jobs – Metro NY area

US visitors

Blogroll

CCIE lab sudy links

Tools

Meta

CCIE jobs – US